In 1998, paleoanthropologist rick potts, of the smithsonian, published an article in the yearbook of physical anthropology, a peer-reviewed journal. the article was titled "environmental hypotheses of hominin evolution." in his paper, potts provided evidence to support his claim that great variations in environmental conditions over time were responsible for the adaptability of humans and the success of our species. why might this not be the best article to reference? potts has no authority. potts was not objective. the article may not reflect current knowledge. the article was not reviewed by potts's peers

i think it is

step-by-step explanation:

a formal letter is a letter the you would send to a king

answer: a.

step-by-step explanation: the answer is a. because, you need to converge the fractions to find a solution.

(23*2)-12=x     x=34

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

and 90% of people marry there 7th grade love. since u have read this, u will be told good news 2night. if u don't pass this on nine comments ur worst week starts now this isn't fake. apparently if u copy and paste this on ten comments in the next ten minutes you will have the best day of ur life tomorrow. you will either get kissed or asked out in the next 53 minutes someone will say i love u

read more on -