Mathematics, 27.06.2019 08:30, lizredrose5

Why is partitioning a directed line segment into a ratio of 1: 3 not the same as finding the length of the directed line segment? the ratio given is part to whole, but fractions compare part to part. the ratio given is part to part. the total number of parts in the whole is 3 – 1 = 2. the ratio given is part to part. the total number of parts in the whole is 1 + 3 = 4. the ratio given is part to whole, but the associated fraction is .

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:30, robclark128

Which statement about the graph of y = 8(0.25)^2

Answers: 2

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:50, annadson4589

Astandard deck of cards contains 52 cards. one card is selected from the deck. (a) compute the probability of randomly selecting a seven or king. (b) compute the probability of randomly selecting a seven or king or jack. (c) compute the probability of randomly selecting a queen or spade.

Answers: 2

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30, Rakeem458

Solve: 3x+y=6 4x-2y=18 show all work !

Answers: 1

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:40, rivera8

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Why is partitioning a directed line segment into a ratio of 1: 3 not the same as finding the length...