Do you know the answer too this question because i don't. if you tell me

Manuela claims that and are congruent. which statement best describes her claim? she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same orientation. she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same orientation.

Which number line correctly shows 0.8 + 0.3?

Given: ab ≅ cd and ad ≅ bc prove: abcd is a parallelogram. statements reasons 1. ab ≅ cd; ad ≅ bc 1. given 2. ac ≅ ac 2. reflexive property 3. △adc ≅ △cba 3. ? 4. ∠dac ≅ ∠bca; ∠acd ≅ ∠cab 4. cpctc 5. ∠dac and ∠bca are alt. int. ∠s; ∠acd and ∠cab are alt. int. ∠s 5. definition of alternate interior angles 6. ab ∥ cd; ad ∥ bc 6. converse of the alternate interior angles theorem 7. abcd is a parallelogram 7. definition of parallelogram what is the missing reason in step 3? triangle angle sum theorem sas congruency theorem sss congruency theorem cpctc