Can someone asap daryl wrote the following proof to prove that alternate interior angles 3 and 5 are congruent. he made two errors in the proof. identify and correct the errors. steps statements justification 1. pq || rs by given2. angle 1 ≅ angle 3 by vertical angle postulate 3. angle 6 ≅ angle 8 by vertical angle postulate 4. angle 1 ≅ angle 8 by exterior angle postulate 5. angle 3 ≅ angle 5 by transitive property of equality

The errors are in steps 4 and 5. Step 4 would be that angle 1 is supplementary to angle 8, and step 5 would be that angles 3 and 5 are congruent because they are alternate interior angles.

i understand 100% 10/10 hit or miss?

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

. your answer will contain x - and y -terms. (1 point) x ( ¿¿ 2 − 7 ) 2 +( y 2 − 9 ) 2 √ ¿ 12. what is the distance from the directrix (the crocodile river) to the point ( x , y )? write this equation. your answer will contain a y -term.