Arecent survey based on a random sample of n=470 voters, predicted that independent candidate for the mayoral election will get 24% of the vote, but he actually got 27%. discuss whether the claim that suggest the survey was done incorrectly! explain your rational.

I have an expression

floating around in my head; let's see if it makes sense.

The variance of binary valued random variable b that comes up 1 with probability p (so has mean p) is

That's for an individual sample. For the observed average we divide by n, and for the standard deviation we take the square root:

Plugging in the numbers,

One standard deviation of the average is almost 2% so a 27% outcome was 3/1.9 = 1.6 standard deviations from the mean, corresponding to a two sided probability of a bit bigger than 10% of happening by chance.

So this is borderline suspect; most surveys will include a two sigma margin of error, say plus or minus 4 percent here, and the results were within those bounds.

dsfdsf

step-by-step explanation:

fddsf

a. turk and mcalister

b. howard, mission, and market

c. yes. since streets end some do not cross yet are not parallel to others. example: mcalister and 5th

step-by-step explanation:

parallel lines are lines which do not intersect ever and look a lot like railroad tracks. turk, mcalister and golden gate are examples of these.

intersect are streets which cross each other and a car on one can reach the other. howard, mission, and market intersect with 6th.

skew lines are lines which neither intersect nor are parallel. these lines exist here because some streets end and never intersect another like mcalister and 5th.