The formula to compute annual straight-line depreciation is

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Aplot of land has been surveyed for a new housing development with borders ab, bc, dc, and da. the plot of land is a right trapezoid with a height of 60 feet and an opposite leg length of 65 feet

If you double the input of a function and it results in half the output, and if you triple the input and it results in a third of the output, what can be guessed about the function? check all that apply.