Penelope is passionate about the environment and animal rights. She lives in Oregon and has found out that California, her neighboring state, has recently passed legislation relaxing the protections for farm animals in the state. She attempts to sue the state in federal court in order to
have the Supreme Court review the case; her lawyer ties the case to the due process clause of the Constitution. Why would her case never reach
the Supreme Court?
OA. Penelope lacks standing to bring the case.
OB
The case is moot before the court.
Ос.
The federal courts don't review state law.
OD
It's a free country, California can do what it wants.

If you plan to exit an expressway after a short period of time, you should drive in a . a. left lane b. center lane c. right lane

You are a member of the parole board and you hear joe donovan's case. do you grant parole or not? support your answer with at least three supporting facts from the video.

Which of the following statements best illustrates an argument on whether congress is effective on providing oversight of the bureaucracy? a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to show more a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further their own interests and not necessarily the public interest. c. congress provides effective oversight of the bureaucracy through the budgetary process. d. congress is not effective in providing oversight because of the budget and enabling legislation.