Is it fair that citizens should have to petition for certiorari to be heard by the Supreme Court? What does the requirement of a grant of certiorari , coupled with the limited number of cases that the supreme court hears , tell you about the role and purpose of the supreme court?

1. should those convicted of violating laws be labeled?

-yes, because they are violating other people's human rights, so why should they get their's and other's don't?

2. do you feel that this labeling would be an infringement on a person's rights?

-yes it does technically but they lose the right to be human when they rap.e people of everything they have.

answer:

the answer is the best one in the room will find it

explanation:

answer:

"it is often classified as either a schedule ii or schedule iii substance, making it illegal to possess for personal use or distribution. crystal meth can be ingested, injected, or smoked. it is a highly addictive substance and can lead to many different personal, medical, and legal problems."

this is the link

hope your friend dont get in trouble

yes, obviously. that violates r@pe and p*dophilia laws, which are some pretty serious laws if you ask me.