Discuss the burden of proof required in criminal cases. Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?

Explain your reasoning.

While proving beyond a reasonable doubt means demonstrating the defendant is most certainly guilty, it does not mean you need to prove absolute certainty. To meet this standard, the prosecution team needs to demonstrate there is no reasonable doubt that the criminal act took place.

Explanation:

Common sense and a clear head

so you come to the correct conclusions and make the right decision based on good judgment and a clear mind and valid thought processes behind it, and not just hasty thinking and recklessness.

explanation:

hey love i hoped this if it didn't let me know. you so much and have a wonderful day : ) keep doing the very best you can and never give up you can do it