Law
Law, 27.08.2021 08:50, twhalon72

. Samantha, a California resident, travels to Oregon to visit the University of Oregon campus. Samantha is thinking about attending the university and wanted to visit the campus before deciding. While in
Eugene, Oregon, Samantha buys a skin care mask from a street vendor on 13th Avenue, a "street fair" type
area where local vendors sell their products. The vendor, Mike Malarky, who is the sole proprietor of
Paradise Skin Care (PSC), has his headquarters and a small retail store in Eugene and does not market his
products outside of Oregon. Samantha was very excited about trying his organic face mask, but decides
to wait until she gets home later that day. Samantha finally arrives home in Sacramento, California after a
long 8 plus hour drive. She is extremely tired and decides it would be quite relaxing to apply her new
face mask. Samantha suffers an extreme reaction to the products contained in the mask and suffers "burn
like” scarring on her face and neck. Understandably upset, Samantha sues Mr. Malarky and PSC in state
court in Sacramento, California court for her injuries asserting a claim for negligence and product
liability.
Assuming that the cause of action is valid, does the California court have personal jurisdiction (In
Personam) over the dealer, Mike Malarky and his company Paradise Skin Care?

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 07.07.2019 11:10, vavzincak
What is one form of speech that is not protected by the u. s. constitution? a. speech about religion b. political speech about a candidate c. speech protesting the government d. speech that is slanderous
Answers: 1
image
Law, 13.07.2019 16:10, aliveajones2005
Frequently, two expressways that intersect will be connected by a . a. cloverleaf interchange b. diamond interchange c. trumpet interchange
Answers: 1
image
Law, 15.07.2019 22:20, youngg52
What was a super predator and how did that effect juvenile sentences?
Answers: 3
image
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30, giusto1073
Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself. d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
. Samantha, a California resident, travels to Oregon to visit the University of Oregon campus. Saman...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 21.02.2021 03:30