Law, 11.06.2021 06:30, idontknow11223344

Should a police chief be permitted to promote an officer with special skills to a supervisory position, or should all officers be forced to spend time in rank? Why or why not?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Law

Law, 15.07.2019 23:20, drepeter86

What are the ramifications of different interpretations of the relationship between loac and human right laws?

Answers: 3

continue

Law, 16.07.2019 17:20, Katyazamo

Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? a. your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for. b. taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries. c. the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out. d. in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 16.07.2019 18:30, giusto1073

Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself. d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.

Answers: 3

continue

Law, 16.07.2019 23:20, irenecupcake4348

The occupational safety and health administration promulgated a rule requiring warehouse employees to wear hardhats when in the vicinity of an operating forklift. the purpose of the hardhats is to protect employees from danger of falling objects. this rule is

Answers: 2

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Should a police chief be permitted to promote an officer with special skills to a supervisory positi...