Case study: ZeeHome took a new project, building a school, in a new geographical area. The company (ZeeHome) was designated as a consultant on the project with the main task of supervising the work of the contractor. To operate as a consultant, the senior engineers of ZeeHome needed to perform site inspection on a regular basis.
ZeeHome management insisted on taking on the consultancy project without making sure that they have the capacity to fulfil their obligations. In fact, during that period, ZeeHome was overloaded and had eight other important projects under process and all ZeeHome senior engineers were already assigned tasks to their full capacity. Consequently, ZeeHome could not dispatch a team of senior engineers to proceed with the inspection visits on a regular basis. Moreover, the few inspection visits that have taken were made by fresh graduated engineers who were still under training.
The school building was completed on time and the school started its educational activities. More than 500 children were attending that school on daily basis. However, after a first heavy rain, and while one of the children, Ben, was playing, the wall of the playground has collapsed over him. Little Ben was heavily injured. He stayed at the hospital for 3 weeks and his parents had to pay $ 20,000 as medical fees. After initial investigations, it turned out that the contractor did not follow the standard procedure in building that school and that ZeeHome could have known that if more inspection visits were made or if the engineers inspecting had more experience.
ZeeHome received another bad news. In fact, in addition to their construction work, ZeeHome manufactures prefabricated houses that are suitable for agricultural fields. It turned out that the rain has also affected several newly prefabricated houses. The owner of these houses informed ZeeHome that the houses have flooded and are asking ZeeHome to repair the damages caused by the flooding estimated at USD 200,000. ZeeHome replied back that it was proven that ZeeHome did not make any fault in manufacturing these houses and therefore they will not repair.

Questions 2:
Issue 2:
2.1 Based on which type of tort ZeeHome could be held liable for the damages caused to the owners of the prefabricated houses because of the flooding? Please explain your answer (40 marks).
2.2 Could ZeeHome be held liable for the damages caused to Ben based on tort of negligence? Please explain your answer considering the different conditions of Tort of negligence (60 marks).
Rule: Must be completed by the students Rule 2.1 Read p. 132-133 Types of Torts
Guided by the textbook, students much identify which type of tort is relevant in this situation.
Rule 2.2 Read p. 142-143 Elements of Negligence Guided by the textbook, students must define strict liability.
In addition, students must also define and explain the elements of negligence as a Tort.
Application: Must be completed by the students
Application 2.1 Students must apply all the elements and conditions of type of tort
identified to the specific case of ZeeHome and the owner of the prefabricated houses. Application 2.2 Students should apply the elements of tort of negligence to the
specific case of ZeeHome and Ben injuries. Conclusion: Must be completed by the students
Students must conclude by giving their opinion based on legal rules answering all the questions mentioned in Issue 2.

How has naturalization made an impact or change in society, government, and the political process?

Which of the follow statements about drinking alcohol and driving is true

September 10, 2016: you’ve been assigned to investigate a hit-and-run incident. when you arrive at the scene, it’s raining and foggy. the roads are slick. it looks like the crash occurred during the early evening, about 5: 30 pm, a couple hours before dark. you notice a green 2010 chevrolet camaro lying off the road on an embankment and a blue 2014 toyota camry several yards back. both vehicles are damaged. robert b., the driver of the camaro, had severe back injuries and was taken to the hospital. the only witness is the toyota driver, fred h. fred h. was driving in the right lane when the accident occurred. according to fred, a red ford pickup truck (year and model unknown) suddenly swerved across the highway from the left lane. the pickup truck hit the front left side of the camaro in one of the center lanes, pushing it off the road before speeding away. the camaro lost control and sideswiped the toyota as it skidded across the highway, denting the toyota’s left side panels. the camaro then skidded across the grass to the right of the highway and crashed into a low concrete wall. the hood and both sides of the camaro have extensive damage. the toyota driver pulled up behind the camaro and called the police. the accident occurred near miami, florida, on i-95 northbound, a 5-lane highway. it happened just before the exit 16 offramp. fred h. and robert b. both passed breathalyzer tests. neither had any passengers in the car. as you search the scene, you notice: tire tracks/skid marks left on the pavement deep red scrapes across the camaro’s panels and green scrapes across the toyota’s panels broken car window fragments of a hood or panel a torn rag an empty beer can deep tire marks and footprints in the mud of the embankment at the scene use the information above to answer the following questions. for each of a – e above, give an example of a type of evidence you could collect from that item and how you would collect it. (one to two sentences each) fill out a crash form for the incident. use the form florida crash report and use the information in the description above to create a brief three- to five-sentence summary for the “narrative” section. use the witness’s description to draw a diagram of the incident. if you can’t find a piece of information for the form, just leave that part blank. impression evidence three separate tire marks were collected from the scene. the marks were found in a pattern that supports fred’s version of events. three tire tread marks, a, b, and c. tire a appears to be worn flat in the middle from overinflation, tire b is narrow and appears worn on the outside edges, tire c looks normal and is not worn at all tires leave different types of marks based on their wear patterns. for example, tires that are constantly flat will leave different impressions than tires that are normally inflated or overinflated. the tires tend to wear out on the parts that are most exposed to the road. you checked out the tires of the two vehicles at the scene. here’s what you found: two tires side by side. a camaro tire which appears to be in good shape, and a toyota tire which appears worn on the outside edges the camaro had normal tires, but the toyota’s tires were a little flat and overly worn on the outside edges. the condition of the red ford truck’s tires is unknown. match the three impressions with the cars that most likely created them. what can you hypothesize about the red pickup’s tires? could this have anything to do with the accident? explain your answer. (two to four sentences) a red pickup fitting fred’s description was later seen running a stoplight. police pulled it over for a check. its tire impressions looked like this: a single tire tread mark which appears worn on the outside edges based on the evidence, do you think this was the same red pickup that rammed the camaro? why or why not? (one to two sentences)