Law
Law, 24.03.2021 20:40, bryneosburn

Read the case Sands v. Rose. • Write a report of at least 1,500 words • Discuss the details of each case, including how, when, and why the suspect
confessed. Include the circumstances of the confession (e. g., was the suspect in
custody, had he or she been read the Miranda rights, etc).
Analyze how the confession impacted the trial-was it admitted as evidence, was
that proper given the circumstances, etc.? If the case was appealed, discuss if and
how the admission or confession played a role in the appellate process.
• Compare the three cases to each other and discuss similarities or differences.
• Finally, discuss if justice was served in each of these cases, why or why not, and how
the admission or confession impacted the outcome of the trial and the life of the
suspect.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 06.07.2019 21:10, 3peak101
Yvonne finds a carpenter to do some repairs for her house and tells him that if he finishes the job by saturday she will pay him 1000. yvonne offer creates an blank contract
Answers: 1
image
Law, 10.07.2019 23:40, chrisroth2924
Assignment: 01.06 review and critical thinking questions criminal
Answers: 2
image
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30, giusto1073
Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself. d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.
Answers: 3
image
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30, hallee25
Which statement best explains why article iii of the constitution gives congress the ability to create lower courts inferior to the supreme court "from time to time”? a. the framers of the constitution believed that as the country grew, more courts would be needed to meet its needs. b. the framers of the constitution believed that as courts made unpopular decisions, they would need to be replaced. c. the framers of the constitution wanted to ensure that congress always had more power than the courts. d. the framers of the constitution wanted to ensure that new courts were always being created so new judges could be appointed.
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
Read the case Sands v. Rose. • Write a report of at least 1,500 words • Discuss the details of each...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
SAT, 19.01.2022 05:00