Which statement describes the significance of the U. S. Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v. Arizona (1966) A. Southern states could no longer maintain racially segregated public schools
B. States could no longer have racial quotas as part of their affirmative action programs
C. Individuals accused of serious crimes unable to pay for an attorney were entitled to a state-sponsored one
D. Suspects had to be told of their right to have an attorney present or to remain silent during police interrogations

Question 1: for those students who do not take traffic school, which of the following is true? . they are 75% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 24% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 16% more likely to have an accident! . they are 10% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 24% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 75% more likely to have an accident - they are 5% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 75% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 16% more likely to have an accident - they are 50% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 5% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 24% more likely to have an accident

3. meena and ala are two friends. meena has a habit of using new pens almostevery day, whereas ala believes in getting a refill for her pen instead of buyinga new pen even though her friends make fun of her.a) which out of two practices would you follow and why? b) which value is ala depicting?

Idid a trial but its not letting me view the questions without signing me out.