Law
Law, 30.01.2021 16:50, chanthonymjones

There are two sides to the debate; On the one hand, there are those who propose that the law and rules of evidence ought to be as exclusionary as possible and only permit evidence that meets "the best evidence" criteria. The alternative view is that the law and rules of evidence ought to be as inclusionary as possible and only exclude evidence if it is prejudicial to a party. Prepare short notes on your thoughts on this debate remembering to point out the rationale for the position you have taken while using examples of either exclusionary or inclusionary rules of evidence in the Evidence Act, Cap 80 Laws of Kenya, case law and common law rules of evidence that are known to you.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 13.07.2019 03:20, 76022sfox
Judicial review works in which of the following ways
Answers: 2
image
Law, 13.07.2019 03:30, noahah3
Question #22 when you approach an intersection with a green traffic light, you should choose an a. approach at a speed that will allow you to stop if the light changes. b. be ready to speed up if the light turns yellow. c. always slow down by a few miles per hour, in case you need to stop.
Answers: 1
image
Law, 15.07.2019 03:10, hcameron65
What do floor leaders in congress do
Answers: 1
image
Law, 15.07.2019 22:40, Cheyenne8694
How has the sentence for felony murder for minors changed over time?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
There are two sides to the debate; On the one hand, there are those who propose that the law and rul...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 18.03.2021 02:30
Konu
Mathematics, 18.03.2021 02:30
Konu
Mathematics, 18.03.2021 02:30