On page 406 of the text, read the case entitled Coker v. Pershad. The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey reasons that AAA had no control over the independent contractor's work and thus Pershad was an employee of Five Star, but Five Star (and by extension, Pershad) were independent contractors to AAA. This type of arrangement is not uncommon. Neither are situations where trucking companies (among others) employ individuals who are designated as independent contractors but are trained by the company and have a manual of regulations provided to them which, in essence, controls where they drive, how they drive, how long are the drivers' work breaks, and who can ride in the cab of the truck. Additionally, drivers often wear a company uniform. The artifice of calling someone an independent contractor when the driver actually is not, is no more than an effort to avoid liability for the person's actions on the job and certain regulatory (unemployment insurance; workers compensation, etc.) and tax considerations. Consequently, the situations must be carefully examined on a case-by-case basis to discern the actual status of the individual. Do you agree with the courts reasoning? Why?
Answers: 3
Law, 03.07.2019 18:10, mv603177
What was the effect of the supreme court’s ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission? a. it removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts. b. it removed all limits on campaign contributions by interest groups. c. it prohibited corporations and businesses from contributing to political campaigns. d. it prohibited interest groups from contributing to individual candidates.
Answers: 1
Law, 06.07.2019 11:10, Liantic8738
Vop hearing iowa 2 tec violation discharge date expired tho can they send me to jail?
Answers: 3
On page 406 of the text, read the case entitled Coker v. Pershad. The Appellate Division of the Supe...
English, 16.10.2020 19:01
History, 16.10.2020 19:01
French, 16.10.2020 19:01
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 19:01
Health, 16.10.2020 19:01