1. What is the Supreme Court doing if it looks at "Court Precedent"

Literally translated, it means “to stand by things decided.” For discussion of precedent, it refers to standing by the rules of prior cases. ... The debate focuses more on constitutional decisions than on those interpreting statutes.

Explanation:

checked this on google boi

1. should those convicted of violating laws be labeled?

-yes, because they are violating other people's human rights, so why should they get their's and other's don't?

2. do you feel that this labeling would be an infringement on a person's rights?

-yes it does technically but they lose the right to be human when they rap.e people of everything they have.