Law, 26.10.2020 05:10, pmartand

The scientists could show that the paint at the crime scene was from a 1992 Chevy. The specific chip of paint that was recovered also matched the chip of paint that was taken from the suspect’s car. What is TRUE about this evidence? They were unable to find class nor individual characteristics.

They were only able to find class characteristics.

They were able to find both class and individual characteristics.

They were only able to find individual characteristics.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Law

Law, 03.07.2019 15:10, paatnguyyen

Why is the supremacy clause considered to be the root of federalism?

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 04.07.2019 09:10, steph1340

How can an environmental law affect a business

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 07.07.2019 02:10, 10040813

Limbic system disorders are possible explanations for criminal behavior under_theries? a. classical b. psychoanalytic c. criminal anthropology .d biocriminiology

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 07.07.2019 11:10, vavzincak

What is one form of speech that is not protected by the u. s. constitution? a. speech about religion b. political speech about a candidate c. speech protesting the government d. speech that is slanderous

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

The scientists could show that the paint at the crime scene was from a 1992 Chevy. The specific chip...