Law
Law, 24.09.2020 06:01, Simplytaylorgrenade

The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. —Alexander Hamilton,
Federalist No. 78

Which statement comes closest to summarizing the meaning of this passage?

Courts should not try to interpret the laws.
Courts should interpret laws and the Constitution.
Courts should follow the laws but not the Constitution itself.
Courts should follow the laws of the legislature.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 03.07.2019 20:40, Daryn121504
Who is the official leader of the state?
Answers: 1
image
Law, 05.07.2019 03:10, sammi90nicole
What is the penalty of shoplifting in florida?
Answers: 2
image
Law, 05.07.2019 20:20, julliette27
How much feet should your car be from a burning vehicle?
Answers: 1
image
Law, 16.07.2019 06:20, holamigosss
How can you tell that you're driving in the right direction? options are a. there is a white line on your left and a yellow line on your right. b. there are yellow lines on both sides of your vehicle. c. there is a double yellow line on your right. d. there is a yellow line on your left and a white line on your right.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is,...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 12.12.2020 16:00
Konu
Geography, 12.12.2020 16:00