Kant offers an example of an honest shopkeeper who refuses to cheat his customers. Kant imagines one motive that the shopkeeper might have: a worry that if he is dishonest, word will get out and he will lose business. Why does Kant discuss this example?

He wants to demonstrate that an honest action can sometimes lack moral worth if it is done from the wrong motive.

Explanation:

Since in the question, Kant predict one motive that if the shopkeeper is dishonest than he will lose his business which makes him worry

This example reflects that if the honest action is taken out that lead to lacking  moral worth in case when it is done with the wrong intention or motive

Therefore the above is the answer that should be considered

arsonist charge

explanation:

when you light somebody's property on fire you are considered and arsonist and are charged with an arsonist charge

answer:

a car

explanation: