Law, 04.08.2020 14:01, Candieboo6939

With reference to the Companies Act, 2019 (Act 992), decided cases and established legal principles, critically analyze the rule in Foss v Harbottle [1843] 2 Hare 461

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Law

Law, 03.07.2019 18:10, mv603177

What was the effect of the supreme court’s ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission? a. it removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts. b. it removed all limits on campaign contributions by interest groups. c. it prohibited corporations and businesses from contributing to political campaigns. d. it prohibited interest groups from contributing to individual candidates.

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 13.07.2019 03:30, noahah3

Question #22 when you approach an intersection with a green traffic light, you should choose an a. approach at a speed that will allow you to stop if the light changes. b. be ready to speed up if the light turns yellow. c. always slow down by a few miles per hour, in case you need to stop.

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 16.07.2019 17:20, maddo36

Which best describes the basis for the right to privacy in the united states? a. the right to privacy is a civil liberty that places limits on government power through the constitution, especially the bill of rights. b. in griswold v. connecticut, the supreme court defined the right to privacy by incorporating the fourth amendment and the right of people to be secure; the self-incrimination clause of the fifth amendment; the ninth amendment; and the due process clause of the 14th amendment. c. the right to privacy is embodied in the words of u. s. justice louis brandeis, "the right to be left alone." d. the term privacy is not in the constitution or bill or rights but it does exist.

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 16.07.2019 18:30, giusto1073

Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself. d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.

Answers: 3

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

With reference to the Companies Act, 2019 (Act 992), decided cases and established legal principles,...