Suppose Barry's wife challenged the legality of the admitted evidence showing that Lynette paid Barry. If Barry's wife claimed her bank account was private and the police had no right to look into it, why couldn't she have the bank account evidence suppressed? a. She didn't have the fundamental right b. She had no justification c. She wouldn't have standing to do so d. She wouldn't have jurisdiction to do so

c. She wouldn't have standing to do so

Explanation:

Barry’s wife challenged the legality of the admitted evidence showing that Lynette paid Barry. She claimed her bank account was private and the police had no right to look into it. She couldn't have the bank account evidence suppressed because she doesn’t have the standing to do so.

This is because though Banks have to protect personal and banking related information they are usually made available for Government agencies under special circumstances.

answer:

c it's motivated by the needs of the patient.

donald trump shouldn’t be impeached. if the alleged action would be impeachable if true, so must be the allegation if false. anything else would give the president the power to distort democracy by calling his opponents criminals without ever having to prove it .for more than a few reasons, more and more americans are beginning to support the impeachment of donald trump or at the very least believe he will be impeached eventually. short of trump trying to establish himself as king, i think impeachment is a very bad idea. i cant believe you democrats' would throw shade on him for reasons that you dont even have proof of. ugh. liberals.