Law, 24.03.2020 17:00, felicityhanson1252

The Supreme Court held that officers who were in hot pursuit of an armed robbery suspect acted reasonably when they entered the house and began to search for the man because ""the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to delay in the course of an investigation if to do so would gravely endanger their lives or the lives of others"" in:

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Law

Law, 03.07.2019 15:10, zahraa244

If the police arrive at larrys office without probable cause or a warrant and demand to search the premises, which amendment protects him from this type of search?

Answers: 2

continue

Law, 03.07.2019 18:10, mv603177

What was the effect of the supreme court’s ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission? a. it removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts. b. it removed all limits on campaign contributions by interest groups. c. it prohibited corporations and businesses from contributing to political campaigns. d. it prohibited interest groups from contributing to individual candidates.

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 07.07.2019 05:10, othello58

47. when must a driver show proof of financial responsibility? a. when requested by a police office b. to register a vehicle or renew its registration c. to obtain a drivers education certificate d. both a and b

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 09.07.2019 11:10, kaliyab191

Continue to drink or use other drugs and drive but be more careful

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

The Supreme Court held that officers who were in hot pursuit of an armed robbery suspect acted reaso...