Why must a judge in a Minnesota Superior Court follow the precedent set by a judge sitting on the Colorado Court of Appeals in a case involving the theft of a motor vehicle?
A. The Minnesota court judge must abide by the Colorado judge's decision because the facts in the Colorado case are more compelling
than those in the Minnesota case.
B. the Minnesota judge does not need to abide by the precedent set in the Colorado Court of Appeals because the two courts exist in
separate and unrelated state jurisdictions
C. The Minnesota judge sits in a lower court than an appellate judge; therefore, the lower-court judge must abide by the ruling of the higher court.
D. the Minnesota judge does not need to abide by the Colorado judge's decision; in fact, the Colorado judge must now reverse her decision to conform to that of the Minnesota judge

answer:

that sucks

explanation:

same

they had banned mine while i was answering a question

answer:

the foreign corrupt practices act of 1977, as amended, 15 u.s.c. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. ("fcpa"), was enacted for the purpose of making it unlawful for certain classes of persons and entities to make payments to foreign government officials to assist in obtaining or retaining business

explanation:

donald trump shouldn’t be impeached. if the alleged action would be impeachable if true, so must be the allegation if false. anything else would give the president the power to distort democracy by calling his opponents criminals without ever having to prove it .for more than a few reasons, more and more americans are beginning to support the impeachment of donald trump or at the very least believe he will be impeached eventually. short of trump trying to establish himself as king, i think impeachment is a very bad idea. i cant believe you democrats' would throw shade on him for reasons that you dont even have proof of. ugh. liberals.