After reading the synopsis of taylor v. baseball club of seattle, l. p., 130 p.3d 835 (wash. ct. app. 2006) in your textbook, discuss the following as posed in the critical thinking section after the case: question 1: would the result in this case have been different if taylor’s minor son, rather than taylor herself, had been struck by the ball? should courts apply the doctrine of assumption of risk to children? what factors would be important in your analysis.

Which of the following statements best illustrates an argument on whether congress is effective on providing oversight of the bureaucracy? a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to show more a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further their own interests and not necessarily the public interest. c. congress provides effective oversight of the bureaucracy through the budgetary process. d. congress is not effective in providing oversight because of the budget and enabling legislation.