For a corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee, the prosecutor does not have to prove: a. that the employee was acting within the scope of his/her employmentb. the employee was acting with the purpose of benefiting the corporationc. the act was imputed to the corporationd. the act is not punishable only by prison timee. that the employee was receiving a benefit from the criminal act
Answers: 1
Other questions on the subject: Law
Law, 09.07.2019 05:20, franstirlacci
How does henry’s statement reflect the idea of social contract? how does the idea of social contract protect people’s natural and individual rights
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
For a corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee, the prosecutor does not...
Questions in other subjects:
