Ronald rawls and zabian bailey were in an auto accident in bridgeport, connecticut. bailey rear-ended rawls at a stoplight. the evidence showed that bailey had failed to apply his brakes in time to avoid the collision, failed to turn his vehicle to avoid the collision, failed to keep his vehicle under control, and was inattentive to his surroundings. because bailey’s auto insurance did not cover all of the costs, rawls filed a suit in a connecticut state court against his own insurance company, progressive northern insurance co. rawls wanted to obtain benefits under an underinsured motorist clause. rawls claimed that bailey had been negligent. could rawls collect from progressive because of bailey’s negligence?

I think he can not . I believe that it has nothing to do that if for example  Bailey had a car insurance with Progressive, which means it is  supposed to provide additional insurance  when they are injured by someone who does not have adequate insurance to cover the full  damages. Bailey was negligent In the car accident. Bailey had failed to apply his brakes in time to avoid the collision, failed to turn his vehicle to avoid the collision, failed to keep his vehicle under control, and was inattentive to his surroundings.

Explanation:

answer:

they didn't want to get killed by the armed forces

explanation:

there was a lot of people there and some of the us armed forces had guns and they didn't want to die

answer: no there are many laws put in place to stop you but if you somehow passed the tests than you could.

explanation: