In a recent case, revlon sued united overseas limited (uol) in the u. s. district court for the southern district of new york for breach of contract. uol countered by asking the court to dismiss the claim since they are not operating in that area. revlon cited the presence of a uol sign above the entrance to the offices of a new york company in which uol had a 50-percent ownership. the court dismissed uol's claim. this is an issue related

Jurisdiction

Explanation:

we know here that in case Revlon sued UOL

UOL ask the court for dismiss the claim

because they not operating in that area

and

UOL had 50 % of ownership here

and court dismissed UOL claim

so we can say according to given data

this is issue related to Jurisdiction because court take legal decisions and judgments this case

answer:

polo g isn't a blood he lives in chicago

explanation:

so he ain't no blood

answer:

c it's motivated by the needs of the patient.