According to the establishment clause, how would a court
rule on this case?
the government gives public funds to low-performing
schools for new computers. they decide to give more
money to the lowest performers, some of which happen to
promote multidenominational religions.
as a direct violation of the clause because government
institutions cannot support religious institutions for any
reason
as a violation of the clause because the government
gave more money to religious schools than public
schools
as in compliance with the clause because the
government's action was for a secular purpose, did not
advance a particular religion, and was unentangled
as in compliance with the clause because the
government gave money to fewer religious schools than
public schools

yes, obviously. that violates r@pe and p*dophilia laws, which are some pretty serious laws if you ask me.

answer:

vaping is good

explanation:

donald trump shouldn’t be impeached. if the alleged action would be impeachable if true, so must be the allegation if false. anything else would give the president the power to distort democracy by calling his opponents criminals without ever having to prove it .for more than a few reasons, more and more americans are beginning to support the impeachment of donald trump or at the very least believe he will be impeached eventually. short of trump trying to establish himself as king, i think impeachment is a very bad idea. i cant believe you democrats' would throw shade on him for reasons that you dont even have proof of. ugh. liberals.