Aserver at a restaurant believed that he was a victim of racial discrimination. he filed a discrimination charge with the eeoc in october 2005. for reasons that are unclear, neither the employee nor the eeoc took any other action regarding the case until october 2011, when the eeoc finally issued a right to sue letter. a lawsuit was filed in december 2011. the employer argued that the case should be dismissed because the lengthy (six-year) delay and the employee’s failure to prompt the eeoc to take action sooner unfairly disadvantaged the defense. should the court allow this case to proceed under these circumstances? why or why not?

Which of the following best describes the principle of informed consent as described in the belmont report? a. voluntariness, risk/benefit assessment, selection of subjects. b. comprehension, conflicts of interest, risk/benefit ratio. c. risk/benefit assessment, justification of research, comprehension. d. information, comprehension, voluntariness.

What does charged off as bad debt canceled by credit grantor mean?

Asubject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. how should the investigator proceed, with respect to the irb, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? a. do not report the adverse drug experience to the irb since it is a common adverse experience. b. report the adverse drug experience to the irb only if there are several other occurrences. c. report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report. d. report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the irb's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the irb.