Law, 18.09.2019 01:10, jakalenn2018

Consider again the harris v. forklift case at the end of chapter 1 "introduction to law and legal systems". the supreme court ruled that ms. harris was entitled to be heard again by the federal district court, which means that there would be a trial on her claim that mr. hardy, owner of forklift systems, had created a "hostile working environment" for ms. harris. apart from the legal aspects, did he really do anything unethical? how can you tell?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Law

Law, 03.07.2019 15:10, jadeevasquez200

Difference between joint tenancy and tenancy in common

Answers: 3

continue

Law, 03.07.2019 15:10, nook4boo

Which of the following best describes the principle of informed consent as described in the belmont report? a. voluntariness, risk/benefit assessment, selection of subjects. b. comprehension, conflicts of interest, risk/benefit ratio. c. risk/benefit assessment, justification of research, comprehension. d. information, comprehension, voluntariness.

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 03.07.2019 20:30, Reese7977

What does the first amendment’s right to assemble refer to? the right of a group to express unpopular opinions the right of a group to make false claims the right of a group to meet in groups the right of a group to speak in protest

Answers: 1

continue

Law, 04.07.2019 09:10, steph1340

How can an environmental law affect a business

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Consider again the harris v. forklift case at the end of chapter 1 "introduction to law and legal sy...