Law
Law, 27.07.2019 01:10, baabyylewis

"the plaintiff, while driving a pickup manufactured by the defendant, was struck in the rear by another motor vehicle. upon impact, the plaintiff's head was jarred backward against the rear window of the cab, causing the plaintiff serious injury. the pickup was not equipped with a headrest, and none was required at the time. should the plaintiff prevail on a cause of action based upon strict liability in tort? why? why not? "

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 07.07.2019 08:10, sha712
Question 1: for those students who do not take traffic school, which of the following is true? . they are 75% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 24% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 16% more likely to have an accident! . they are 10% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 24% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 75% more likely to have an accident - they are 5% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 75% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 16% more likely to have an accident - they are 50% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 5% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 24% more likely to have an accident
Answers: 1
image
Law, 07.07.2019 22:10, Arealbot
Criminalnology is an empirical science which encompasses the following areas of study
Answers: 2
image
Law, 09.07.2019 19:20, laraekeyes
3. meena and ala are two friends. meena has a habit of using new pens almostevery day, whereas ala believes in getting a refill for her pen instead of buyinga new pen even though her friends make fun of her.a) which out of two practices would you follow and why? b) which value is ala depicting?
Answers: 1
image
Law, 10.07.2019 04:40, deflox74
Idid a trial but its not letting me view the questions without signing me out.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
"the plaintiff, while driving a pickup manufactured by the defendant, was struck in the rear by anot...

Questions in other subjects: