Ineed to make a counterclaim can somebody do it for me plz! reporter mcquill mentions your claim will be stronger if you respond well to someone who disagrees with you. use this framework to challenge a counterclaim. even though some people think that _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. this is the claim: the united states should have proclaimed war on the grounds that there were numerous blended connections between the us and mexico. the us needed texas to finish show fate. mexico was not fit to represent texas. reason 1 the us joined the war because that the mexicans incited the war by killing americans. a second reason is mexico wasn't fit for texas since mexicans murdered americans on questioned an area. the americans were made that blood was being shed on american soil.

Explanation:

Step One:

1. Describe events that explain the border differences between these maps. Use information from the maps and the lesson in your response. Use complete sentences.

The picture on the left of the map is Oregon's territory, Mexican Cession, and others. The map on the right presents where the oil, coal, and gold were located.

2.Besides land, what did the United States gain from expansion? Use information from the maps and the lesson in your response. Use complete sentences.

America gained more oil, gold, and coal.

Step Two: Answer the question below using the framework provided.

People disagree whether the United States should have gone to war against Mexico. Should the United States have declared war? Consider information from the lesson and maps to explain your claim with at least two reasons.

The United States _ _ _ because _ _ _. A second reason is _ _ _.

The United States should have gone to war because we would not be in the united states without California and texas. A second reason is that we would not have this land we have now. We would not have California and texas's significant advantages and resources like oil and gold.

Step Three: Form your counterargument using the framework provided.

Reporter McQuill mentions your claim will be stronger if you respond well to someone who disagrees with you. Use this framework to challenge a counterclaim.

Even though some people think that _ _ _.

Even though some people think that the Mexican-American War is never-ending, it will end.

Please Do NOT Copy, Your teacher may find out that you copied this from someone, cite and rewrite!

the outcome of 1970 oil crisis in united states was that, they began to search ways on how to reduce oil.

in 1970 was a period when there were energy and oil crisis. those who were major centers for industrialization were forced to keep way from supplying of petroleum.

some of the result of this crisis was economic growth became stagnant because prices of oil surged.

due to the increased prices some countries like mexico and norway benefited.

i am 99% sure that the increase of goods was because of nafta nafta stands for the north american free trade agreement to lift tariffs