History, 24.07.2019 03:30, ashanti93

1. was the treaty of versailles a good peace treaty for the future? write a paragraph that answers this question. begin with a clear topic sentence, such as “the treaty of versailles was a good peace treaty for the future” or “the treaty of versailles was not a good peace treaty for the future.” the remainder of the paragraph should include facts to support your claim. you may want to review the subsections titled “redrawing the map” on page 679 and “consequences of the versailles treaty” on page 681.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

The Treaty of Versailles was not a good treaty for the future.

The "war guilt" clause forced Germany to accept responsibility for the war and harshly punished the country. They were forced to reduced their military and pay huge sums of money in reparations. This will eventually cause Germany to retaliate under the leadership of Hitler.

The League of Nations was ineffective and unorganized. The US, who had created the idea, refused to join the League. When faced with an aggressive Germany, they proved ineffectual and were not able to do anything to stop the aggression.

Many colonies and smaller allied nations were left resentful as they were not given freedom or land of their own. Japan wanted to gain colonies out of the war and were given nothing. India and Vietnam were hoping to gain freedom from France and Great Britain as a reward for their help and no such luck. This will all create world resentment and create causes for World War II.

answered: Guest

C4 i’m pretty sure

answered: Guest

congress seems to have some powers the states do not have. they can do some pretty big things, they can declare war. and they can lead armies and navies. they also have the power to create a mail delivery system, make foreign treaties, print and borrow money, (both states and congress can do that)and make rules for certain places, i think they said the western states.

the new government has been a big to growing their country! they are getting new land over west. and they are passing laws which to settle boundary issues.

although most of this information sounds good for them, bad for us, there are some weaknesses from their plan. the people are still having issues with taxes and trading goods, they also don't have a main leader such as a chief or a president. they also have trouble with currency. the states are printing out so much money the national currency is beginning to be worthless. so things are getting hard to handle over here.

some of the americans like the new government and think that even if they could ask about changing it they would be ignored. daniel shays got a group of people who hated the new government and decided to attack. this could become either worse or better.

(one-paragraph analysis)

i think that they may start a war or some sort of big attack to make them change their government. most americans just don't want to discuss it. but i think that daniel man will speak up for them. if they do scare them they will get a better government and be able to deal with their issues better! i think that is what is going to happen next in the u.s., sincerely

lorelei hope this i had some from the internet u can report me if u want