History
History, 24.07.2019 19:30, reghanhoward3

Best answer gets -paragraph 1: this is where you introduce your topic. the first sentence should be a "hook" sentence where you grab your audience's attention. towards the end, you state the side you are on (ancient asia or ancient africa). also, an introduction that explains the topic of contributions and states both claims -paragraph #2: this is where the bulk of your argument/persuasion will come. you want to use at least 5 examples and elaborate on all five examples to explain how life has changed due to the contributions of either ancient asia or ancient africa. ***this is also where you include your counter argument counter-argument example: for example, the ancient africans were responsible for the production of iron with the kush dynasty. this society because now people could have stronger armor, weapons, and tools. (here comes the counter argument). although africa did provide iron as a valuable resource, they created iron at the expense of the environment. in order to create the iron, the ancient africans had to smelt the iron by cutting down thousands of trees and hurting the environment. on the other hand, the people of ancient china creating things like the compass and the fishing wheel which society grow in terms of exploration and food. (*the counter argument above is simply an example. you will have to use your own) paragraph #3: this is your conclusion. this is where you want to buy in your audience 1 more time. introduce 1-2 new things you did not mention and reemphasize your counter argument. my recommendation, select ancient asia (because they have more examples to choose from): ancient asia contributions (from the course): -silk making -iron-forging -common money and laws -multiplication table -cast iron -stirrups (for riding horses) -magnetic compass -gunpowder -rudder for boats -paper-making -fishing reel -wheelbarrow -compass -hot-air balloon -smallpox vaccine -mechanical clock ancient africa contributions (from the course): -pyramids -papyrus -gold -salt -iron

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 21:30, mjam85877
Mens rea is a latin term that means guilty mind and refers to the concept of whether or not a person intended to commit a crime. why is mens rea considered a key component in many types of crimes?
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, bellabae8390
Was the amassing of men, equipment, and supplies for the 1944 invasion of europe. operation varsity operation nordwind operation dragoon operation overload operation torch
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:30, rickyop8010
Which statement in the passage best reflects sumer's opinion of the dred scott decision? a."i speak what cannot be denied." b."[the] judgment was sustained by a falsification of history." b."the opinion was more thoroughly abominable than anything history." i speak what cannot be denied when i declare that the opinion of the chief justice in the case of dred scott was more thoroughly abominable than anything of the kind in the history of courts. judicial baseness reached its lowest point on that occasion. you have not forgotten that terrible decision where a most unrighteous judgment was sustained by a falsification of history. -charles sumner, 1865
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 03:00, ashtynbursiaga
Why did some people support supply-side economics and others opposed it? it addressed the supply of goods and ignore demand. it called for large tax cuts for the wealthy. forigen production played a significant role in the plan. the program called for increased government spending.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Best answer gets -paragraph 1: this is where you introduce your topic. the first sentence should b...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Physics, 19.05.2021 05:50
Konu
History, 19.05.2021 05:50