History
History, 25.07.2019 22:00, rylei

In his first inaugural address, abraham lincoln stated the following: all profess to be content in the union if all constitutional rights can be maintained. is it true, then, that any right plainly written in the constitution has been denied? i think not. happily, the human mind is so constituted that no party can reach to the audacity of doing this. think, if you can, of a single instance in which a plainly written provision of the constitution has ever been denied. if by the mere force of numbers a majority should deprive a minority of any clearly written constitutional right, it might in a moral point of view justify revolution; certainly would if such right were a vital one. but such is not our case. what does this quote say about lincoln's feelings about the south's discontent? a. he was more concerned with building the economy of the north than dealing with the south's discontent. b. he felt that since the constitution did not apply to the southern states, they shouldn't complain about their rights. c. he felt that the people of the south had not been denied any of their constitutional rights. d. he felt that the people of the south had been denied many of their constitutional rights.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 01:00, lovelarissa
In 1944, the supreme court upheld the authority of the u. s. government to order the internment of a minority group in the interest of national security, even though there was no evidence that any members of this group were disloyal to the united states. should the same policy be applied today against u. s. muslims or muslim immigrants? why or why not? are these forms of internment different from native reservations? if so how? if not, why?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:00, ddwithdadarco
Why did president wilson want the us to provide leadership at the end of wwi
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:50, johnsont8377
Write about 50 words explaining whether or not this passage supports that explanation. in the introduction, you heard genghis khan’s explanation of why the mongols were successful conquerors in his time. the mongols were illiterate . . and perhaps no more than 700,000 in number. . they were herdsmen on the grassy plains north of the gobi desert, south of siberia’s forests. before the year 1200, the mongols were fragmented, moving about in small bands headed by a chief, or khan, and living in portable felt dwellings. the mongols endured frequent deprivations [hardships] and sparse areas for grazing their animals. they frequently fought over turf, and during hard times, they occasionally raided, interested in goods rather than bloodshed.
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 16:30, bitterswt01
In the late 1600s the change by the british government in enforcing colonial rule was called
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
In his first inaugural address, abraham lincoln stated the following: all profess to be content in...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Chemistry, 29.03.2021 14:00