History
History, 26.07.2019 17:00, davidoj13

In the dred scott case, the supreme court decided           a. the missouri compromise was illegal because it freed slaves in the slave states.   b. the missouri compromise was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law.   c. the compromise of 1850 was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law.   d. the missouri compromise was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave of his or her freedom if they lived in the south.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 02:00, yourmumsanoodle
Why did the paris peace conference negotiations last over a year?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 03:00, Jorjalilli8081
Explain the reasons for u. s. neutrality during the 1920s and 1930s. how did ideas about neutrality change during the period from the end of world war i to the passage of the lend-lease act? be sure to include any events, terms, or people that may support your response.
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, elysalmeron05
Why did people from washington ride out to manassas junction to view the battle?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, 913003853
Can someone me write a paragraph on this topic i feel confused
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
In the dred scott case, the supreme court decided           a. the missou...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 10.03.2021 18:30
Konu
English, 10.03.2021 18:30
Konu
Mathematics, 10.03.2021 18:30