Which of the following is a valid conclusion that can be drawn from the statement, “resources like time, money, and energy are scarce”? a. since time is endless, it cannot be a scarce resource. b. time and money are more important resources than energy. c. if resources are scarce, everyone cannot have everything they want. d. if resources are scarce, a person should always choose money because money can buy energy.

C. If resources are scarce, everyone cannot have everything they want.

Explanation:

This is the valid conclusion that can be drawn from the statement. While the other sentences do not express an idea that is present in the statement, this does, as it highlights the effect of dealing with scarce resources. The fact that time, money and energy are scarce means that we cannot have unlimited amounts of it. In turn, this means that everyone cannot have everything they want.

why do you think kush in nubia is not as well-known as egypt?

for the 2 countries u can do china and america because america has a democratic government while china has a communist government.

a democracy is a government run by the people either by directly voting or indirectly by electing representatives. an oligarchy is a government run by a few or a small group of people. a democracy and oligarchy are similar because both in an oligarchy and an indirect democracy, a small group of induvial determine the laws for a large group of people they are different because in an oligarchy it is easier to control and they do not have to answer to a large number of people in the country, unlike a democracy where they do have to answer to a large number of people an county that is a democracy would be the united states. a country that is an oligarchy would be the china.