History, 28.07.2019 02:30, Lakelife12

Read the excerpt below from the supreme court ruling in the scott v. sandford. [t]he legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the declaration of independence, show, that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people. the main subject of the excerpt is

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 23:00, maryalice2002

It can be inferred that the dramatic increase in defense spending by germany was the result of. (a) attempts by great britain to take german colonies. ( b) fear of a two-front war against france and russia (c) the need to put down a communist rebellion (d) a competition with the allies to produce atomic weapons

Answers: 1

continue

History, 21.06.2019 23:30, starfox5454

What was the difference between bombing military targets in the united kingdom, and bombing the city of london? a. bombing a city kills lots of innocent civilians, bombing a military target doesn't b. bombing military targets didn't force the u. k. to surrender, but bombing london did c. military targets were bombed by japan, while london was bombed by the nazis d. london was bombed before the u. s. entered the war; military targets were bombed afterward

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 03:30, haileyhale5

Why do you think this exchange happened in a private meeting?

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 06:30, Dallas3506

Why did louis xvi call a meeting of the estates-general in 1789? how long had it been since such a meeting had been called?

Answers: 2

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Read the excerpt below from the supreme court ruling in the scott v. sandford. [t]he legislation and...