History
History, 11.10.2019 16:30, xolocsin

Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary source's havr over primary sources for historians
a) they cant offer historians firsthand interpretation of an important event
b) they can act as hard evidence to prove whether a society used a particular tool
c) they can provide a general summary of evidence other historians have discovered
d) they can reveal to a historian exactly how people of an ancient culture lived


Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary source's havr over primary sources for

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:50, lbelle
Which of the following two groups did not do battle with the romans? select all that apply.
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:50, taylorruiz16
What did palestinian leader mahmoud abbas promise after succeeding yasir arafat in 2004?
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, vocepilogue16
After nine states had ratified the constitution by mid-1788, other states quickly followed. all thirteen states had to obey it. it became law in the united states. none of the states had to obey it.
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:00, lovwhydontwe
The talf hartley act of 1947 restricted the rights of
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary source's havr over primary sources for...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 25.06.2019 23:30