Did the supreme court's decision in mcconnell resolve all constitutional as-applied challenges to the bcra when it upheld the disclosure requirements of the statute as constitutional?

The appropriate response is No. The Supreme Court overruled Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce and bits of McConnell v. FEC. The larger part kept up that political discourse is vital to a popular government, which is no less evident in light of the fact that the discourse originates from a partnership. The lion's share additionally held that the BCRA's revelation prerequisites as connected to The Movie were sacred, thinking that divulgence is legitimized by a "governmental interest" in giving the "electorate with information" about election-related spending assets.