American government! ! why did the supreme court rule that burning the american flag is a form of free expression but that burning a cross, in some cases, is not a form of free expression? a. they argued that burning a cross is the same as burning a draft card and therefore not protected. b. they argued that burning a cross is more offensive than burning a flag and therefore not protected. c. they argued that burning a cross in political protest is symbolic and therefore not protected. d. they argued that burning a cross to scare people was threatening and therefore not protected.

hi friend   look late me tall   you with my experience first politic because this subject   it is more politic than be religious   and also give you my experience in islam

first   the islam it is not religion order to kill for we be clear .

so bin laden he not was man of religion   for he use they taught sound islamic theology.

osama bin laden he was influenced by mullah mohammad omar, a very radical manosama bin laden's little understanding of religion has made osama bin laden's speech radical and deviated from the teachings of islam

so the answer > they used radical persuasive rhetoric

because people what other people gold

explanation: