History
History, 02.08.2019 12:00, ghaithalhamdani

During athens’ first democracy, the people

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, zoeycrew
In the decision for dred scott vs. sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 01:00, jae222
The soviet union and the united states believed in two very different economic systems. what were the names of each?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 01:30, nothingworksoutforme
Describe the indian removal from north georgia. was the evacuation carried out according to plan? explain.
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 07:00, niyag2gi
Which is a result of the free exercise clause? parents can prevent their children from being vaccinated. people with a religious objection to military service cannot be drafted. businesses that sell religious materials can be open only on sundays. amish children do not have to attend school past the eighth grade.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
During athens’ first democracy, the people...

Questions in other subjects: