History
History, 02.08.2019 19:30, heyitsnott3rex

How did the dred scott v. sanford us supreme court case intensify the fight for abolition? a) the high court ruled in favor of sanford under the condition that he will free dred scott upon his death. b) the high court ruled in favor of dred scott granting him freedom; thus persuading society that slaves have rights. c) the high court ruled slaves are property and therefore have no rights; thus strengthening the fight for abolition. d) the high court ruled the issue of slave rights is a reserved power and thus the states solely have authority to grant rights to slaves.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 07:30, guzmangisselle
What was an important consequence of the neolithic revolution? ):
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:00, OlamideO3
In the space provided, analyze the pros and cons of establishing smaller ethnic communities within larger communities like chinatown and little italy. use evidence to support your reasoning.
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 10:00, fake7667
Islam descended from what early religion
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 12:00, Maelynne8515
In 1975, how did the united nations respond to the worldwide struggle for women's rights? a) issued a declaration of human rights that addressed gender inequality b) held its first international conference on women's status in the world c) wrote a resolution that encouraged nations to solve their own problems d) encouraged women to fight for their rights through rebellion and resistance
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
How did the dred scott v. sanford us supreme court case intensify the fight for abolition? a) the...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 13.07.2019 01:00