In the supreme court’s decision in korematsu v. united states, the court said that korematsu was not a spy and deserved equal rights. was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights. was a spy and should be imprisoned immediately. was a spy but was free to go back to japan.

was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights.

Korematsu v. the US was a court case where Korematsu sued the US for the detainment of him and the Japanese during World War II.

In the court decision, the Supreme Court decided that Korematsu was legally detained because it was a time of war. The executive order to detain and move the Japanese was upheld as constitutional because of the war powers clause. In a time of war, citizens are required to give up rights and that had been established in earlier wars as well. This was the sacrifice the Japanese had to give to protect the safety of the country.

In the Supreme Court’s decision in Korematsu v. United States, the court said that Korematsu was a spy and should be imprisoned immediately.

Further Explanation:

During World War II, the United States was at war with Japan. At that time, many Japanese Americans were residing in the country. Following Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor, on 7th December 1941, the government issued an order to create exclusive military areas. Subsequently, internment camps were created, in which all people who were of Japanese descent, irrespective of whether or not they were aliens, were to be relocated. However, this was challenged by the 23-year old Japanese American, Fred Korematsu, on the grounds that it violated the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, under which no person “shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”

However, the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the government to hold people of Japanese descent, irrespective of whether or not they were American citizens, in the internment camps organized for them. It felt that, given the wartime situation with Japan at the time, it was absolutely indispensable to protect the American nation against espionage by Japan. This wartime necessity itself was far more important than the rights of Japanese Americans. From the viewpoint of the military, given the hostile scenario with Japan at that time, it was all but necessary that all American citizens of Japanese descent must be separated from the West Coast, as long as the war with Japan continued.

Learn more:

1. According to the supreme court, which of these most likely prompted the arrest of the protesters in edwards v. south carolina?

2. In the case Roe v. Wade, the supreme court ruled that state laws?

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Korematsu v. United States

Keywords: World War II, Japan, Pearl Harbor, Fred Korematsu, Fifth Amendment, Supreme Court .

in november 1781, john hanson became the first president of the united states in congress assembled, under the articles of confederation. many people have argued that john hanson, and not george washington, was the first president of the united states, but this is not quite true.

explanation:

a and b!

dfroos means which is a and b