One major difference between mcpherson's and horwitz's historical interpretation of the civil war.

The difference lies in interpreting the two sides of the conflict. McPherson saw the war as the war between the evil South and the good North. He was focused on the abolition of slavery and their integration into the society as free people. Horwitz on the other hand saw South not as evil but as a faction which went to war to protect its economic interests.

Um well north korea is a very harsh place because students go to school for 24 hours and almost never rest and the president is well i think sends to much bomb that’s what i think

Ashe out in the battle field being a nurse