How did belgian imperialism in africa differ from british imperialism

The Belgium had two colonies in Africa, the massive Belgian Congo (now Congo) and Ruanda-Urundi (now countries of Rwanda and Burundi), and that’s it. Compare that to the Brits that had colonies in nearly all continents. Compared to the British, Belgian rule on its colonies was harsh. The Belgians extracted resources from its colonies nearly at gunpoint (especially in Congo) to build magnificent public infrastructure in the mother country, while doing little to educate native Africans in the colonies.The British retained traditional leaders and gave them power with colonial oversight, and established schools on its colonies.

i think option 3. would be ur best bet and u need to write it urself

have a good day