Which statement about the anahuac standoff and the battle of velasco is true? a neither the battle of velasco not the anahuac standoff had any bloodshed or fatalities. b the anahuac standoff had a peaceful solution, while the battle of velasco was the first bloodshed of the texas evolution. c both the battle of velasco and the anahuac standoff had numerous deaths and extensive bloodshed. d the battle of velasco had a peaceful ending, while the anahuac standoff involved bloodshed. if u answer have the right question and ill give u brainleist.

What was the difference between bombing military targets in the united kingdom, and bombing the city of london? a. bombing a city kills lots of innocent civilians, bombing a military target doesn't b. bombing military targets didn't force the u. k. to surrender, but bombing london did c. military targets were bombed by japan, while london was bombed by the nazis d. london was bombed before the u. s. entered the war; military targets were bombed afterward

Why do you think the delegates to the first contintal congress believed that refusing to buy british goods would their cause?

Can you summarize this? it takes time and caution to perfect anything which must be concealed. it takes time to crush men who are pursuing legitimate trade. but one of mr. rockefeller’s most impressive characteristics is patience. there never was a more patient man, or one who could dare more while he waited. the folly of hurrying, the folly of discouragement, for one who would succeed, went hand in hand. everything must be ready before he acted, but while you wait you must prepare, must think, work. "you must put in, if you would take out." his instinct for the money opportunity in things was amazing, his perception of the value of seizing this or that particular invention, plant, market, was unerring.