Why did the government act quickly to end union-led strikes? question 28 options: there was an implied contractual obligation that was undermined by a strike. there was a belief that strikes were related to anarchy and socialism. the government was run by former big business bosses. workers were duty bound to report for work.

The correct answer is "There was a belief that strikes were related to anarchy and socialism". The union-led strikes that happened during the late 1800s, were oftenly the result of conflict between workers and factory owners. The government realized that these strikes should be terminated before workers could led to anarchy and socialism among the people.

here are some major conflicts i found. maybe pick one and do more research on it. (cause i ain't writing 6 paragraphs)

in 1877, the nez perce war took place.

1881 - president james garfield was assassinated.

1882 - the chinese exclusion act was passed.

1883 - a decision in the civil rights cases legalized racial segregation in the united states.

1887 - the dawes act was passed.

1893 - the panic of 1893 took place. (what a creative name)

and there are probably other topics you can find if you just search up "united states timeline," or "conflicts in the 19th century for america."

then once you find a topic you like find out how it affected the people of america and what not. (sorry if this feels a bit short changed, history was and never will be one of my strong topics)

cornfield (filler filler filler filler ignore this filler filler)