The idea of total war existed in all countries involved in world war i. for example, countries used isolationism conscription rationing drafting to determine how much food, rubber, gasoline, and other items each citizen could use during the war. in order to draft more soldiers into the military, many of the nations established a policy of mandatory ration conscription armistice militarism . some countries also controlled public opinion during the war by using conscription bourgeoisie censorship nationalism to prevent discouraging news from reaching the public.

The idea of total war existed in all countries involved in World War I. For example, countries used rationing to determine how much food, rubber, gasoline, and other items each citizen could use during the war. In order to draft more soldiers into the military, many of the nations established a policy of mandatory conscription . Some countries also controlled public opinion during the war by using censorship to prevent discouraging news from reaching the public.

Explanation:

These are the words that best fill in the blanks. Rationing refers to the practice of putting limits on the consumption of particular goods. Conscription refers to the practice of recruiting people to join the Armed forces. The word usually implies a mandatory obligation to serve. Finally, censorship refers to the practice of banning certain information from being made public. These are all strategies commonly used during times of war.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!